Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

PALAIOS

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Novack-Gottshall, P. M. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Using Simple Body-Size Metrics to Estimate Fossil Body Volume: Empirical Validation Using Diverse Paleozoic Invertebrates

¹ University of West Georgia, Department of Geosciences, Carrollton, Georgia 30118-3100, USA pnovackg{at}westga.edu

Body size is one of the most significant organismal characteristics because of its strong association with nearly all important ecological and physiological characteristics. While direct body mass measurement (or estimation from other size metrics) is not feasible with most extinct taxa, body volume is a measurable and general proxy for fossil size. This study explores the reliability of several metrics that can be used to estimate the body volume of Paleozoic invertebrates of various sizes, shapes, taxonomic affinities, and ecological habits. The ATD model, based on the product of lengths of the three major body axes (anteroposterior, transverse, and dorsoventral), is simple and widely applicable. Models specific to particular morphological and taxonomic groups are slightly more accurate than this ATD model, but the advantages are minor. The ATD model is consistent with previous studies demonstrating widespread shape allometry—that is, small taxa tend to have globose geometries while large ones tend to be conical, even within the same taxonomic group. The ATD model successfully predicts the volume of 10 validation samples that were excluded from development of the original model. Because the linear measurements used to estimate volume are easy to obtain from specimens in the field or from published work, estimates of body volume can be incorporated into paleontological analyses, even those spanning multiple phyla.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Payne, A. G. Boyer, J. H. Brown, S. Finnegan, M. Kowalewski, R. A. Krause Jr., S. K. Lyons, C. R. McClain, D. W. McShea, P. M. Novack-Gottshall, et al. Two-phase increase in the maximum size of life over 3.5 billion years reflects biological innovation and environmental opportunity PNAS, January 6, 2009; 106(1): 24 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Finnegan and M. L. Droser Body size, energetics, and the Ordovician restructuring of marine ecosystems Paleobiology, September 1, 2008; 34(3): 342 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Novack-Gottshall and M. A. Lanier Scale-dependence of Cope's rule in body size evolution of Paleozoic brachiopods PNAS, April 8, 2008; 105(14): 5430 - 5434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Novack-Gottshall Ecosystem-wide body-size trends in Cambrian-Devonian marine invertebrate lineages Paleobiology, March 1, 2008; 34(2): 210 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]